Alerts
What needs your attention · ranked by impact and urgency.
Every alert cites the rule that fired it and the numbers that triggered it.
Showing 17 distinct rules
(collapsed from 72 raw alert rows).
Each card shows the latest period's numbers; other periods where the same rule fired are chipped below the title.
CRITICAL
2026-03
receivables
· ₹182,100 at stake
priority 100
₹1.82L stuck with customers over 60 days
That's 50.2% of your monthly revenue, sitting beyond the 60-day mark. Collections machinery isn't keeping up.
Verdict
Collections breaking down on multiple accounts.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: medium
Overdue > 60 days
₹182,100
% of monthly revenue
50.2%
Why this threshold?
60+ day overdue is the 'serious problem' ageing bucket per collections best practice. >15% of monthly revenue means collections aren't keeping up.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 6 times
click to expand
2026-03
2026-02
2026-01
2025-12
2025-11
2025-10
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2026-03 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹182,100
|
| 2026-02 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹182,100
|
| 2026-01 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹214,700
|
| 2025-12 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹212,401
|
| 2025-11 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹224,201
|
| 2025-10 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹212,401
|
Do this
Drop a collections war-room this week. Target top 3 overdue customers on day one.
rule receivables.overdue_60_critical · triggered 2026-04-23T12:02:45
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-11
receivables
· ₹531,001 at stake
priority 100
Customers take 88 days to pay you
DSO of 88 days is well above the safe ceiling of 75.
Verdict
Collection cycle is stretching — real cash impact every day this holds.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: medium
Why this threshold?
DSO > 75 days is >2.5× the typical 30-day credit cycle for services-SMB; signals a real collections problem.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 5 times
click to expand
2025-11
2025-08
2025-02
2025-01
2024-04
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2025-11 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹531,001
|
| 2025-08 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹488,761
|
| 2025-02 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹359,901
|
| 2025-01 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹412,501
|
| 2024-04 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹108,401
|
Do this
Move to weekly (not monthly) collections reviews until DSO drops below 60.
rule receivables.dso_critical · triggered 2026-04-25T11:40:00
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
liquidity
· ₹2,623,500 at stake
priority 100
Cash runway only 0.0 months
You have ₹39.6k in bank and burn ₹8.74L/month → runway of 0.0 months. Anything under 3 months demands immediate action.
Verdict
Runway in the red zone — cash will run out within the quarter at this burn.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: high
Runway (months)
0.05 mo
Closing bank + cash
₹39,591
Monthly opex burn
₹874,500
Why this threshold?
3 months is the minimum time to execute a capital raise or major cost cut. Below that, typical options narrow to distress moves.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 6 times
click to expand
2025-03
2024-11
2024-10
2024-09
2024-08
2024-07
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2025-03 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹2,623,500
|
| 2024-11 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹769,661
|
| 2024-10 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹174,567
|
| 2024-09 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹613,614
|
| 2024-08 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹711,600
|
| 2024-07 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹132,000
|
Do this
1) Pull the top-5 receivables calls this week. 2) Defer discretionary spend (marketing, hiring). 3) Start the capital-raise conversation if not already running.
rule liquidity.runway_critical · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
liquidity
· ₹181,449 at stake
priority 100
Bank balance dropped 82% in one period
Closing bank fell from ₹2.21L (2025-02) to ₹39.6k (2025-03) and EBITDA is negative. A drop this steep in a single period demands an immediate cash-flow autopsy.
Verdict
Cash is leaking — the Cash Flow Statement holds the answer.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: high
Prior bank balance
₹221,040
Current bank balance
₹39,591
Drop %
-82.1%
Why this threshold?
Bank-balance drop > 25% in a single period is larger than normal monthly noise — points to real cash outflow that needs diagnosis.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 4 times
click to expand
2025-03
2024-10
2024-07
2024-05
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2025-03 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹181,449
|
| 2024-10 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹137,460
|
| 2024-07 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹114,700
|
| 2024-05 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹41,452
|
Do this
1) Open Cash Flow Statement (Indirect) for this period to see operating vs investing vs financing drain. 2) Confirm no capital drawings or one-time outflows explain it. 3) Tighten collections + defer non-essential spend this cycle.
rule liquidity.cash_decline_critical · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2026-01
payables
· ₹141,600 at stake
priority 100
Paying vendors only every 125 days
Creditors of ₹1.42L vs monthly purchase run-rate ⇒ DPO of 125 days. Anything above 120 days is a distress signal to vendors — expect supply issues or cash-on-delivery demands.
Verdict
Vendor relationships at risk — stretch has gone past industry-tolerable.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: medium
DPO (days)
125 days
Creditors
₹141,600
Do this
1) Clear top-5 oldest vendor dues this week. 2) Negotiate written extended terms rather than silent stretch. 3) If cash-starved: trigger liquidity measures (collection push / credit line).
CRITICAL
2025-03
margin
· ₹874,500 at stake
priority 100
Operating loss of ₹8.74L
EBITDA is ₹-8.74L on revenue of ₹1.40L. You're spending more than you earn at the operating level.
Verdict
Unit economics broken this period — find the leak before financing gets more expensive.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: medium
EBITDA
₹-874,500
EBITDA margin
-624.6%
Why this threshold?
EBITDA <0 means unit economics are upside-down at the operating level — not a financing issue, a business-model issue.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 3 times
click to expand
2025-03
2025-02
2024-04
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2025-03 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹874,500
|
| 2025-02 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹9,890
|
| 2024-04 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹55,050
|
Do this
Break this out by segment (Segment Analytics) to see which line is burning.
CRITICAL
2025-03
margin
· ₹644,191 at stake
priority 100
Segment 'Maharashtra' is losing money
Revenue ₹21.09L but net margin ₹-6.44L. Other segments are subsidising this one.
Verdict
Maharashtra is cash-negative — price it up, serve it down, or cut it.
Why this threshold?
Any segment with negative net margin is subsidised by others — decide to fix, price-up, or cut.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
Do this
Decide: is Maharashtra a strategic loss-leader, or should it be fixed this quarter? If no clear answer in 30 days, stop accepting new work in this segment.
rule margin.segment_loss · entity Maharashtra · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
margin
· ₹137,452 at stake
priority 100
Segment 'Rajasthan' is losing money
Revenue ₹4.50L but net margin ₹-1.37L. Other segments are subsidising this one.
Verdict
Rajasthan is cash-negative — price it up, serve it down, or cut it.
Why this threshold?
Any segment with negative net margin is subsidised by others — decide to fix, price-up, or cut.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
Do this
Decide: is Rajasthan a strategic loss-leader, or should it be fixed this quarter? If no clear answer in 30 days, stop accepting new work in this segment.
rule margin.segment_loss · entity Rajasthan · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
liquidity
· ₹422,640 at stake
priority 100
Cash Ratio at 0.09 — almost no cash cover
Cash & Bank = ₹39.6k against ₹4.62L in current liabilities. Less than 10% cover. One missed collection could trigger a cash crunch.
Verdict
Cash buffer effectively zero — very fragile.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: high
Cash Ratio
0.09
Cash & Bank
₹39,591
Current Liabilities
₹462,231
Why this threshold?
Most conservative: cash vs bills. <0.2 = any missed collection triggers a crunch.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
Do this
Hold back all discretionary spend; prioritise cash receipts over anything else this week.
rule liquidity.cash_ratio_critical · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
returns
· ₹867,016 at stake
priority 100
Negative Return on Equity: -526.4%
Loss of ₹8.67L on Equity of ₹1.65L. Shareholder capital is being eroded this period. Continued negative ROE eventually wipes out the accumulated equity cushion.
Verdict
Capital base shrinking — equity is being consumed.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: high
ROE
-526.44%
PAT
₹-867,016
Equity
₹164,694
Why this threshold?
Negative return on equity means shareholders' capital is being consumed. Continued erosion exhausts the cushion.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 3 times
click to expand
2025-03
2025-02
2024-04
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2025-03 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹867,016
|
| 2025-02 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹9,890
|
| 2024-04 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹55,050
|
Do this
Review unit economics segment-by-segment; cut loss-making lines; stop fresh investments until profitability restored.
CRITICAL
2026-03
margin
· ₹164,784 at stake
priority 91
EBITDA margin dropped 45.5 pts (from 86.3% to 40.8%)
A multi-point margin drop usually signals cost overruns or pricing erosion.
Verdict
Margin compression — costs outgrew revenue this period.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: high
Prev Pct
86.27
Cur Pct
40.82
Delta Pts
-45.46
Cur Rev
362,500.00
Prev Rev
358,500.00
Cur Ebitda
147,956.00
Prev Ebitda
309,289.00
Why this threshold?
2–5pt drop is larger than typical monthly noise for a stable business; catches margin erosion early.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 6 times
click to expand
2026-03
2026-01
2025-10
2025-08
2025-05
2025-01
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2026-03 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹164,784
|
| 2026-01 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹117,926
|
| 2025-10 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹19,681
|
| 2025-08 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹14,478
|
| 2025-05 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹95,590
|
| 2025-01 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹12,114
|
Do this
Compare opex by category against last period. Direct cost, people, or one-offs?
rule margin.ebitda_compression_critical · triggered 2026-04-22T18:24:24
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2026-01
growth
· ₹70,000 at stake
priority 69
Revenue fell 25.7% vs 2025-12
Net revenue dropped from ₹2.73L to ₹2.02L. A sudden double-digit drop is a red flag — chase it down before the next period closes.
Verdict
Revenue is falling fast — find the cause in segments, customers, or pipeline.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: high
Current
202,500.00
Prior period
₹272,500
% change
-25.7%
Why this threshold?
MoM drop > 10% is larger than typical customer/seasonality noise. Above 20% demands root-cause investigation in the same period.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
History · this rule has fired 6 times
click to expand
2026-01
2025-11
2025-08
2025-05
2025-01
2024-12
| Period |
Severity |
Status |
Amount |
| 2026-01 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹70,000
|
| 2025-11 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹85,500
|
| 2025-08 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹208,000
|
| 2025-05 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹35,000
|
| 2025-01 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹50,000
|
| 2024-12 |
CRITICAL |
new |
₹67,500
|
Do this
Break revenue by customer & segment for the two periods. Identify which customers stopped buying.
rule growth.revenue_drop_critical · triggered 2026-04-25T11:39:53
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
margin
· ₹39,556 at stake
priority 57
Segment 'Delhi' is losing money
Revenue ₹1.29L but net margin ₹-39.6k. Other segments are subsidising this one.
Verdict
Delhi is cash-negative — price it up, serve it down, or cut it.
Why this threshold?
Any segment with negative net margin is subsidised by others — decide to fix, price-up, or cut.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
Do this
Decide: is Delhi a strategic loss-leader, or should it be fixed this quarter? If no clear answer in 30 days, stop accepting new work in this segment.
rule margin.segment_loss · entity Delhi · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
margin
· ₹27,490 at stake
priority 39
Segment 'Karnataka' is losing money
Revenue ₹90.0k but net margin ₹-27.5k. Other segments are subsidising this one.
Verdict
Karnataka is cash-negative — price it up, serve it down, or cut it.
Why this threshold?
Any segment with negative net margin is subsidised by others — decide to fix, price-up, or cut.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
Do this
Decide: is Karnataka a strategic loss-leader, or should it be fixed this quarter? If no clear answer in 30 days, stop accepting new work in this segment.
rule margin.segment_loss · entity Karnataka · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
margin
· ₹13,745 at stake
priority 20
Segment 'Punjab' is losing money
Revenue ₹45.0k but net margin ₹-13.7k. Other segments are subsidising this one.
Verdict
Punjab is cash-negative — price it up, serve it down, or cut it.
Why this threshold?
Any segment with negative net margin is subsidised by others — decide to fix, price-up, or cut.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
Do this
Decide: is Punjab a strategic loss-leader, or should it be fixed this quarter? If no clear answer in 30 days, stop accepting new work in this segment.
rule margin.segment_loss · entity Punjab · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
margin
· ₹4,582 at stake
priority 20
Segment 'Madhya Pradesh' is losing money
Revenue ₹15.0k but net margin ₹-4.6k. Other segments are subsidising this one.
Verdict
Madhya Pradesh is cash-negative — price it up, serve it down, or cut it.
Why this threshold?
Any segment with negative net margin is subsidised by others — decide to fix, price-up, or cut.
You can tune this rule's cutoff per-client via the rule-override table; the default is shown above.
Do this
Decide: is Madhya Pradesh a strategic loss-leader, or should it be fixed this quarter? If no clear answer in 30 days, stop accepting new work in this segment.
rule margin.segment_loss · entity Madhya Pradesh · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →
CRITICAL
2025-03
solvency
· ₹649 at stake
priority 20
Interest Coverage at -1353.8× — cannot service debt from earnings
EBIT ₹-8.79L ÷ Finance Cost ₹649 = -1353.80×. Below 1.5× means current earnings barely cover — or don't cover — interest expense. Principal repayments must come from reserves or more debt.
Verdict
Earnings cannot pay interest — classic distress signal.
Evidence · the numbers this rule fired on
confidence: high
Interest Coverage
-1353.80×
EBIT
₹-878,619
Finance Cost
₹649
Do this
Restructure or refinance debt; cut interest cost; boost operating earnings urgently.
rule solvency.interest_cov_critical · triggered 2026-04-22T18:27:47
Audit history →