F
Acuere Consultancy

Cash Flow Statement (Indirect Method)

Built from TB: PAT + non-cash add-backs ± working-capital changes. Reconciles to opening + closing bank balance.

February 2026
Quick pick
Fiscal year
Custom date range
vs: nothing prior period last year
custom ▾
Fiscal year
Custom date range
Method: Direct Method Indirect Method View: Client Consultant
Starts from PAT; non-cash add-backs + ΔWC Download PDF

Consultant view — includes per-ledger inflows/outflows, voucher counts, skipped journals, per-ledger variance, and cross-checks.

Net Cash Flow · February 2026
−₹53,720

The business burned ₹53,720 of cash this period — bank + petty cash shrank by this amount.

Opening
₹467,444
Closing
₹413,724

Cash Reconciliation

Opening + Net CF = Closing · the identity that proves every ₹ is accounted for

Opening Balance
₹467,444
at period start
+
Net Cash Flow
−₹53,720
from this CFS
=
Expected Closing
₹413,724
per the equation
Actual: ₹413,724
Reconciles · ₹0 variance

Indirect Cash Flow Statement

Full line-by-line build from PAT — including per-ledger detail for every working-capital and non-cash adjustment

Starts from PAT (from the P&L). Non-cash items are added back. WC deltas are computed from opening vs closing balances in the TB. Tax & interest paid come from the Payments Register (voucher-level).

Profit After Tax (PAT) ₹297,180.00
= Operating profit before WC changes ₹297,180.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Trade Receivables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = 169,480.00 across 1 ledger(s). Non-cash components excluded from working capital to avoid double counting (e.g. bad-debt write-offs reduce Debtors without affecting cash)
Ledgers: Sundry Debtors
−₹169,480.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Tax Prepayments (TDS Recv / Advance Tax)
Δ = -153,500.00 across 2 ledger(s)
Ledgers: TDS Receivable 24-25, TDS Receivable - 25-26
₹153,500.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Duties & Taxes (aggregate)
Δ = 28,080.00 across 1 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Duties & Taxes
₹28,080.00
= Cash generated from operations ₹309,280.00
Net Cash from Operating Activities ₹309,280.00
Net Cash from Investing Activities ₹0.00
Drawings / Capital withdrawn — Rahul Nathani
Cr movement − Dr movement = -363,000.00
Ledgers: Rahul Nathani
−₹363,000.00
(No PAT adjustment — profit not yet appropriated)
PAT of ₹297,180.00 is NOT reflected in any equity ledger Δ (P&L A/c / Reserves Δ ≈ 0 and partner capital net Δ is pure drawings). ΔEquity already equals −Drawings, so no PAT subtraction needed. If your firm DOES appropriate profit at year-end, post a journal: Dr P&L A/c, Cr Partner Capital — then re-run this report.
₹0.00
Net Cash from Financing Activities −₹363,000.00
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash −₹53,720.00

Direct ↔ Indirect reconciliation

Section-by-section — voucher-sourced Direct vs TB-Δ Indirect. Large variance ⇒ specific mapping/tagging gap

Section Direct (voucher) Indirect (TB Δ) Variance Likely cause if variance ≠ 0
Operating net 309,280.00 309,280.00 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Investing net 0.00 -0.00 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Financing net -363,000.00 -363,000.00 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Net Cash Flow (all sections) -53,720.00 -53,720.00 0.00
TB Bank/Cash period movement (ground truth) -53,720.00

Financing drill-down

Partner / Capital outflow (Direct — from payment vouchers) 363,000.00
Partner / Capital inflow (Direct — contributions) 0.00
Direct net (Capital contributions − Drawings) -363,000.00
Loan taken (Direct) 0.00
Loan repaid (Direct) 0.00
Direct net (Borrowings) 0.00
Operating reconciliation — line-by-line variance: 0 (reconciled)

(Indirect build vs Direct voucher breakdown) If Indirect Operating ≠ Direct Operating, the gap lives in exactly one (or two) of the lines below.

Indirect Operating build Amount
Profit After Tax (PAT) 297,180.00
= Operating profit before WC changes 297,180.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Trade Receivables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = 169,480.00 across 1 ledger(s). Non-cash components excluded from working capital to avoid double counting (e.g. bad-debt write-offs reduce Debtors without affecting cash)
Ledgers: Sundry Debtors
-169,480.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Tax Prepayments (TDS Recv / Advance Tax)
Δ = -153,500.00 across 2 ledger(s)
Ledgers: TDS Receivable 24-25, TDS Receivable - 25-26
153,500.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Duties & Taxes (aggregate)
Δ = 28,080.00 across 1 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Duties & Taxes
28,080.00
= Cash generated from operations 309,280.00
Net Cash from Operating Activities 309,280.00
Direct Operating (from vouchers) Amount
Inflows
Trade Receivables
6 ledger(s): D S DODHIYA & CO, EKATRA RETAIL VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, Koshar Resources India Private Limited, OTIF MULTI SOLUTIONS LLP, …
243,300.00
TDS Receivable (refund)
1 ledger(s): TDS Receivable 24-25
163,750.00
Income Tax refund received
1 ledger(s): Interest on Income Tax Refund
7,904.00
Outflows
GST Payable
2 ledger(s): CGST, SGST
−36,450.00
Employee Cost
1 ledger(s): Staff Salary
−32,000.00
Income Tax paid (via refund adjustment)
1 ledger(s): Income Tax Expense
−20,013.00
Office & Admin
2 ledger(s): Electricity Bill, Housekeeping Expenses
−10,210.00
Travel & Field
1 ledger(s): Business Meeting Expenses
−7,000.00
Other / Unmapped
1 ledger(s): Round Off
−1.00
Direct Operating Net 309,280.00

How to use this: scan for the component on the Indirect side whose sign/magnitude doesn't match a corresponding category on the Direct side. Common suspects: (a) a "Provisions / Bad Debts / Write-offs" add-back that's larger than expected — means an expense got tagged non-cash that actually hit the bank; (b) a WC line whose Δ is big but the matching Direct category is small (mis-tagged wc_component); (c) "Income Tax paid" line smaller than the Direct "Tax Paid" category — means some tax payments used ledger names the Indirect regex doesn't catch (e.g. "TCS", "Professional Tax").

Per-ledger Operating variance 20 ledgers · every rupee traced

Sum of the Δ column equals the Operating variance between methods. Rows with Δ > 0 = Indirect over-counts; Δ < 0 = Indirect under-counts. Sort: biggest absolute variance first.

Ledger Nature Category Indirect Op Direct Op Δ (Ind − Dir) Indirect classification rule applied
Professional Fees income Revenue 358,500.00 0.00 358,500.00 income (+Cr−Dr = 358,500.00−0.00)
Sundry Debtors asset Trade Receivables -169,480.00 0.00 -169,480.00 asset Receivable — −(Dr−Cr) = −(423,030.00−253,550.00)
EKATRA RETAIL VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED 0.00 100,000.00 -100,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Pragati Software Pvt Ltd 0.00 54,000.00 -54,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
D S DODHIYA & CO 0.00 40,500.00 -40,500.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Duties & Taxes liability Duties & Taxes 28,080.00 0.00 28,080.00 liability nan — +(Cr−Dr) = +(64,530.00−36,450.00)
PK GLOBAL POWER PRIVATE LIMITED 0.00 23,600.00 -23,600.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Income Tax Expense expense Statutory & Tax 0.00 -20,013.00 20,013.00 expense Tax (below PBT line, no Op impact)
CGST 0.00 -18,225.00 18,225.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
SGST 0.00 -18,225.00 18,225.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
OTIF MULTI SOLUTIONS LLP 0.00 16,200.00 -16,200.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
TDS Receivable - 25-26 asset TDS Receivable -10,250.00 0.00 -10,250.00 asset nan — −(Dr−Cr) = −(10,250.00−0.00)
Koshar Resources India Private Limited 0.00 9,000.00 -9,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Electricity Bill expense Office & Admin -5,710.00 -5,710.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(5,710.00−0.00))
Round Off expense Other / Unmapped -1.00 -1.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(1.00−0.00))
Business Meeting Expenses expense Travel & Field -7,000.00 -7,000.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(7,000.00−0.00))
TDS Receivable 24-25 asset TDS Receivable 163,750.00 163,750.00 0.00 asset nan — −(Dr−Cr) = −(0.00−163,750.00)
Staff Salary expense Employee Cost -32,000.00 -32,000.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(32,000.00−0.00))
Housekeeping Expenses expense Office & Admin -4,500.00 -4,500.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(4,500.00−0.00))
Interest on Income Tax Refund income Indirect Income 7,904.00 7,904.00 0.00 income (+Cr−Dr = 7,904.00−0.00)
Totals 329,293.00 309,280.00 20,013.00
Engine's Indirect Op (from `indirect_operating_net`) 309,280.00 309,280.00 0.00 Must match the Totals row above (within paisa of rounding). Any mismatch ⇒ attribution rule bug.

How to read this: each ledger contributes a specific amount to Indirect Operating (per accrual rules: income ⇒ +Cr−Dr, expense ⇒ −(Dr−Cr), asset WC ⇒ −(Dr−Cr), liability WC ⇒ +(Cr−Dr)). Direct attributes cash flow per actual voucher processing. Where the two diverge by a non-trivial amount, it's a specific mapping / classification / treatment issue on that ledger — not "rounding". Click a row's ledger name in a future version to see every voucher that touched it.

Equity ledgers pulled into Indirect engine 4 ledger(s) · debug Financing variance

Everything here contributes to raw_eq_delta; PAT is subtracted at end. If your P&L A/c or Reserves ledger is missing from this list, that's why Financing variance = PAT — my mask didn't catch it.

Ledger Nature tag Category Δ (Cr − Dr) Included because
Prateek Agrawal equity Partner's Capital 0.00 nature=equity
Rahul Nathani equity Partner's Capital -363,000.00 nature=equity
Sakshi Nathani Partner A/c equity Partner's Capital 0.00 nature=equity
Profit & Loss A/c equity Retained Earnings 0.00 nature=equity + name matches P&L/Reserves pattern + category='Retained Earnings' matches
raw_eq_delta (sum of above) -363,000.00
PAT adjustment decision: PAT not posted to any equity ledger (P&L Δ = 0.00, partner net Δ = -363,000.00 is pure drawings). PAT still sits unposted in Income−Expense, so ΔEquity already equals −Drawings and no PAT subtraction is needed.

If Direct's partner-drawings figure ≠ Indirect's equity Δ (after PAT adjustment), that's a mapping/tagging problem. The Direct figure comes from actual Dr <Partner> / Cr Bank voucher lines — this is ground truth. If Indirect says something different, investigate the partner-ledger TB classification or PAT value.