F
Acuere Consultancy

Cash Flow Statement (Indirect Method)

Built from TB: PAT + non-cash add-backs ± working-capital changes. Reconciles to opening + closing bank balance.

October 2025
Quick pick
Fiscal year
Custom date range
vs: nothing prior period last year
custom ▾
Fiscal year
Custom date range
Method: Direct Method Indirect Method View: Client Consultant
Starts from PAT; non-cash add-backs + ΔWC Download PDF

Consultant view — includes per-ledger inflows/outflows, voucher counts, skipped journals, per-ledger variance, and cross-checks.

Net Cash Flow · October 2025
−₹18,520

The business burned ₹18,520 of cash this period — bank + petty cash shrank by this amount.

Opening
₹410,806
Closing
₹392,286

Cash Reconciliation

Opening + Net CF = Closing · the identity that proves every ₹ is accounted for

Opening Balance
₹410,806
at period start
+
Net Cash Flow
−₹18,520
from this CFS
=
Expected Closing
₹392,286
per the equation
Actual: ₹392,286
Reconciles · ₹0 variance

Indirect Cash Flow Statement

Full line-by-line build from PAT — including per-ledger detail for every working-capital and non-cash adjustment

Starts from PAT (from the P&L). Non-cash items are added back. WC deltas are computed from opening vs closing balances in the TB. Tax & interest paid come from the Payments Register (voucher-level).

Profit After Tax (PAT) ₹205,159.99
= Operating profit before WC changes ₹205,159.99
(Increase) / Decrease in Trade Receivables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = 101,830.00 across 1 ledger(s). Non-cash components excluded from working capital to avoid double counting (e.g. bad-debt write-offs reduce Debtors without affecting cash)
Ledgers: Sundry Debtors
−₹101,830.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Tax Prepayments (TDS Recv / Advance Tax)
Δ = 12,700.00 across 2 ledger(s)
Ledgers: TDS Receivable 24-25, TDS Receivable - 25-26
−₹12,700.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Duties & Taxes (aggregate)
Δ = 12,571.70 across 1 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Duties & Taxes
₹12,571.70
= Cash generated from operations ₹103,201.69
Net Cash from Operating Activities ₹103,201.69
(Purchase) of Fixed Assets
Δ Non-Current Assets (net TB) = 66,101.69
Ledgers: Mobile Phone, Power Banks, Watch (Apple)
−₹66,101.69
Net Cash from Investing Activities −₹66,101.69
Drawings / Capital withdrawn — Rahul Nathani
Cr movement − Dr movement = -55,620.00
Ledgers: Rahul Nathani
−₹55,620.00
(No PAT adjustment — profit not yet appropriated)
PAT of ₹205,159.99 is NOT reflected in any equity ledger Δ (P&L A/c / Reserves Δ ≈ 0 and partner capital net Δ is pure drawings). ΔEquity already equals −Drawings, so no PAT subtraction needed. If your firm DOES appropriate profit at year-end, post a journal: Dr P&L A/c, Cr Partner Capital — then re-run this report.
₹0.00
Net Cash from Financing Activities −₹55,620.00
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash −₹18,520.00

Direct ↔ Indirect reconciliation

Section-by-section — voucher-sourced Direct vs TB-Δ Indirect. Large variance ⇒ specific mapping/tagging gap

Section Direct (voucher) Indirect (TB Δ) Variance Likely cause if variance ≠ 0
Operating net 103,201.69 103,201.69 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Investing net -66,101.69 -66,101.69 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Financing net -55,620.00 -55,620.00 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Net Cash Flow (all sections) -18,520.00 -18,520.00 0.00
TB Bank/Cash period movement (ground truth) -18,520.00

Financing drill-down

Partner / Capital outflow (Direct — from payment vouchers) 55,620.00
Partner / Capital inflow (Direct — contributions) 0.00
Direct net (Capital contributions − Drawings) -55,620.00
Loan taken (Direct) 0.00
Loan repaid (Direct) 0.00
Direct net (Borrowings) 0.00
Operating reconciliation — line-by-line variance: -0 (Indirect too low)

(Indirect build vs Direct voucher breakdown) If Indirect Operating ≠ Direct Operating, the gap lives in exactly one (or two) of the lines below.

Indirect Operating build Amount
Profit After Tax (PAT) 205,159.99
= Operating profit before WC changes 205,159.99
(Increase) / Decrease in Trade Receivables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = 101,830.00 across 1 ledger(s). Non-cash components excluded from working capital to avoid double counting (e.g. bad-debt write-offs reduce Debtors without affecting cash)
Ledgers: Sundry Debtors
-101,830.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Tax Prepayments (TDS Recv / Advance Tax)
Δ = 12,700.00 across 2 ledger(s)
Ledgers: TDS Receivable 24-25, TDS Receivable - 25-26
-12,700.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Duties & Taxes (aggregate)
Δ = 12,571.70 across 1 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Duties & Taxes
12,571.70
= Cash generated from operations 103,201.69
Net Cash from Operating Activities 103,201.69
Direct Operating (from vouchers) Amount
Inflows
Trade Receivables
4 ledger(s): NK SARRAF & ASSOCIATES, OTIF MULTI SOLUTIONS LLP, SATYA IRON & STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED, Shreearth Financial (Debtor)
192,760.00
Outflows
Employee Cost
2 ledger(s): Bonus, Staff Salary
−30,000.00
GST Payable
3 ledger(s): CGST, IGST, SGST
−22,820.00
GST Input Tax on CAPEX
1 ledger(s): Vishal Peripherals
−11,898.31
Trade Payables
1 ledger(s): Kaushal Cateres
−10,500.00
Travel & Field
1 ledger(s): Business Meeting Expenses
−8,500.00
Office & Admin
2 ledger(s): Courier Expense, Electricity Bill
−5,840.00
Direct Operating Net 103,201.69

How to use this: scan for the component on the Indirect side whose sign/magnitude doesn't match a corresponding category on the Direct side. Common suspects: (a) a "Provisions / Bad Debts / Write-offs" add-back that's larger than expected — means an expense got tagged non-cash that actually hit the bank; (b) a WC line whose Δ is big but the matching Direct category is small (mis-tagged wc_component); (c) "Income Tax paid" line smaller than the Direct "Tax Paid" category — means some tax payments used ledger names the Indirect regex doesn't catch (e.g. "TCS", "Professional Tax").

Per-ledger Operating variance 21 ledgers · every rupee traced

Sum of the Δ column equals the Operating variance between methods. Rows with Δ > 0 = Indirect over-counts; Δ < 0 = Indirect under-counts. Sort: biggest absolute variance first.

Ledger Nature Category Indirect Op Direct Op Δ (Ind − Dir) Indirect classification rule applied
Professional Fees income Revenue 265,500.00 0.00 265,500.00 income (+Cr−Dr = 265,500.00−0.00)
Sundry Debtors asset Trade Receivables -101,830.00 0.00 -101,830.00 asset Receivable — −(Dr−Cr) = −(313,290.00−211,460.00)
OTIF MULTI SOLUTIONS LLP 0.00 81,000.00 -81,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Shreearth Financial (Debtor) 0.00 59,000.00 -59,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
NK SARRAF & ASSOCIATES 0.00 29,160.00 -29,160.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
SATYA IRON & STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED 0.00 23,600.00 -23,600.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
IGST 0.00 -14,400.00 14,400.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
TDS Receivable - 25-26 asset TDS Receivable -12,700.00 0.00 -12,700.00 asset nan — −(Dr−Cr) = −(12,700.00−0.00)
Duties & Taxes liability Duties & Taxes 12,571.70 0.00 12,571.70 liability nan — +(Cr−Dr) = +(47,790.00−35,218.30)
Vishal Peripherals 0.00 -11,898.31 11,898.31 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Kaushal Cateres 0.00 -10,500.00 10,500.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Catering Services expense Office & Admin -10,000.00 0.00 -10,000.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(10,000.00−0.00))
Tax Audit Charges expense Professional Fees -6,000.00 0.00 -6,000.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(6,000.00−0.00))
CGST 0.00 -4,210.00 4,210.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
SGST 0.00 -4,210.00 4,210.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Round Off expense Other / Unmapped -0.01 0.00 -0.01 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(0.01−0.00))
Electricity Bill expense Office & Admin -4,960.00 -4,960.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(4,960.00−0.00))
Business Meeting Expenses expense Travel & Field -8,500.00 -8,500.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(8,500.00−0.00))
Staff Salary expense Employee Cost -20,000.00 -20,000.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(20,000.00−0.00))
Courier Expense expense Office & Admin -880.00 -880.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(880.00−0.00))
Bonus expense Employee Cost -10,000.00 -10,000.00 0.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(10,000.00−0.00))
Totals 103,201.69 103,201.69 -0.00
Engine's Indirect Op (from `indirect_operating_net`) 103,201.69 103,201.69 -0.00 Must match the Totals row above (within paisa of rounding). Any mismatch ⇒ attribution rule bug.

How to read this: each ledger contributes a specific amount to Indirect Operating (per accrual rules: income ⇒ +Cr−Dr, expense ⇒ −(Dr−Cr), asset WC ⇒ −(Dr−Cr), liability WC ⇒ +(Cr−Dr)). Direct attributes cash flow per actual voucher processing. Where the two diverge by a non-trivial amount, it's a specific mapping / classification / treatment issue on that ledger — not "rounding". Click a row's ledger name in a future version to see every voucher that touched it.

Equity ledgers pulled into Indirect engine 4 ledger(s) · debug Financing variance

Everything here contributes to raw_eq_delta; PAT is subtracted at end. If your P&L A/c or Reserves ledger is missing from this list, that's why Financing variance = PAT — my mask didn't catch it.

Ledger Nature tag Category Δ (Cr − Dr) Included because
Prateek Agrawal equity Partner's Capital 0.00 nature=equity
Rahul Nathani equity Partner's Capital -55,620.00 nature=equity
Sakshi Nathani Partner A/c equity Partner's Capital 0.00 nature=equity
Profit & Loss A/c equity Retained Earnings 0.00 nature=equity + name matches P&L/Reserves pattern + category='Retained Earnings' matches
raw_eq_delta (sum of above) -55,620.00
PAT adjustment decision: PAT not posted to any equity ledger (P&L Δ = 0.00, partner net Δ = -55,620.00 is pure drawings). PAT still sits unposted in Income−Expense, so ΔEquity already equals −Drawings and no PAT subtraction is needed.

If Direct's partner-drawings figure ≠ Indirect's equity Δ (after PAT adjustment), that's a mapping/tagging problem. The Direct figure comes from actual Dr <Partner> / Cr Bank voucher lines — this is ground truth. If Indirect says something different, investigate the partner-ledger TB classification or PAT value.