F
Acuere Consultancy

Cash Flow Statement (Indirect Method)

Built from TB: PAT + non-cash add-backs ± working-capital changes. Reconciles to opening + closing bank balance.

July 2024
Quick pick
Fiscal year
Custom date range
vs: nothing prior period last year
custom ▾
Fiscal year
Custom date range
Method: Direct Method Indirect Method View: Client Consultant
Starts from PAT; non-cash add-backs + ΔWC Download PDF

Consultant view — includes per-ledger inflows/outflows, voucher counts, skipped journals, per-ledger variance, and cross-checks.

Net Cash Flow · July 2024
−₹114,700

The business burned ₹114,700 of cash this period — bank + petty cash shrank by this amount.

Opening
₹237,644
Closing
₹122,944

Cash Reconciliation

Opening + Net CF = Closing · the identity that proves every ₹ is accounted for

Opening Balance
₹237,644
at period start
+
Net Cash Flow
−₹114,700
from this CFS
=
Expected Closing
₹122,944
per the equation
Actual: ₹122,944
Reconciles · ₹0 variance

Indirect Cash Flow Statement

Full line-by-line build from PAT — including per-ledger detail for every working-capital and non-cash adjustment

Starts from PAT (from the P&L). Non-cash items are added back. WC deltas are computed from opening vs closing balances in the TB. Tax & interest paid come from the Payments Register (voucher-level).

Profit After Tax (PAT) ₹126,000.00
= Operating profit before WC changes ₹126,000.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Trade Receivables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = 123,900.00 across 1 ledger(s). Non-cash components excluded from working capital to avoid double counting (e.g. bad-debt write-offs reduce Debtors without affecting cash)
Ledgers: Sundry Debtors
−₹123,900.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Trade Payables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = -30,100.00 across 3 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Provisions, Sundry Creditors, Partner Reimbursement (Rahul)
−₹30,100.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Tax Prepayments (TDS Recv / Advance Tax)
Δ = 1,500.00 across 2 ledger(s)
Ledgers: TDS Receivable 24-25, TDS Reveivable 23-24
−₹1,500.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Duties & Taxes (aggregate)
Δ = -10,200.00 across 1 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Duties & Taxes
−₹10,200.00
= Cash generated from operations −₹39,700.00
Net Cash from Operating Activities −₹39,700.00
Net Cash from Investing Activities ₹0.00
Drawings / Capital withdrawn — Rahul Nathani
Cr movement − Dr movement = -75,000.00
Ledgers: Rahul Nathani
−₹75,000.00
(No PAT adjustment — profit not yet appropriated)
PAT of ₹126,000.00 is NOT reflected in any equity ledger Δ (P&L A/c / Reserves Δ ≈ 0 and partner capital net Δ is pure drawings). ΔEquity already equals −Drawings, so no PAT subtraction needed. If your firm DOES appropriate profit at year-end, post a journal: Dr P&L A/c, Cr Partner Capital — then re-run this report.
₹0.00
Net Cash from Financing Activities −₹75,000.00
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash −₹114,700.00

Direct ↔ Indirect reconciliation

Section-by-section — voucher-sourced Direct vs TB-Δ Indirect. Large variance ⇒ specific mapping/tagging gap

Section Direct (voucher) Indirect (TB Δ) Variance Likely cause if variance ≠ 0
Operating net -39,700.00 -39,700.00 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Investing net 0.00 -0.00 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Financing net -75,000.00 -75,000.00 0.00 — reconciles cleanly
Net Cash Flow (all sections) -114,700.00 -114,700.00 0.00
TB Bank/Cash period movement (ground truth) -114,700.00

Financing drill-down

Partner / Capital outflow (Direct — from payment vouchers) 75,000.00
Partner / Capital inflow (Direct — contributions) 0.00
Direct net (Capital contributions − Drawings) -75,000.00
Loan taken (Direct) 0.00
Loan repaid (Direct) 0.00
Direct net (Borrowings) 0.00
Operating reconciliation — line-by-line variance: 0 (reconciled)

(Indirect build vs Direct voucher breakdown) If Indirect Operating ≠ Direct Operating, the gap lives in exactly one (or two) of the lines below.

Indirect Operating build Amount
Profit After Tax (PAT) 126,000.00
= Operating profit before WC changes 126,000.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Trade Receivables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = 123,900.00 across 1 ledger(s). Non-cash components excluded from working capital to avoid double counting (e.g. bad-debt write-offs reduce Debtors without affecting cash)
Ledgers: Sundry Debtors
-123,900.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Trade Payables
Δ (TB opening→closing) = -30,100.00 across 3 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Provisions, Sundry Creditors, Partner Reimbursement (Rahul)
-30,100.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Tax Prepayments (TDS Recv / Advance Tax)
Δ = 1,500.00 across 2 ledger(s)
Ledgers: TDS Receivable 24-25, TDS Reveivable 23-24
-1,500.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Duties & Taxes (aggregate)
Δ = -10,200.00 across 1 ledger(s)
Ledgers: Duties & Taxes
-10,200.00
= Cash generated from operations -39,700.00
Net Cash from Operating Activities -39,700.00
Direct Operating (from vouchers) Amount
Inflows
Trade Receivables
3 ledger(s): Finaccle Advisory Private Limited, GA Design, S S M G & ASSOCIATES LLP
75,200.00
Outflows
GST Payable
3 ledger(s): CGST, IGST, SGST
−39,900.00
Employee Cost
1 ledger(s): Staff Welfare Expenses
−24,220.49
Travel & Field
2 ledger(s): Business Meeting Expenses, Travelling Expense
−22,550.11
Office & Admin
2 ledger(s): Office Expenses, Telephone Expenses
−18,374.16
Operating Expense
1 ledger(s): Indian Instute of Corporate Affairs
−9,855.23
Direct Operating Net -39,700.00

How to use this: scan for the component on the Indirect side whose sign/magnitude doesn't match a corresponding category on the Direct side. Common suspects: (a) a "Provisions / Bad Debts / Write-offs" add-back that's larger than expected — means an expense got tagged non-cash that actually hit the bank; (b) a WC line whose Δ is big but the matching Direct category is small (mis-tagged wc_component); (c) "Income Tax paid" line smaller than the Direct "Tax Paid" category — means some tax payments used ledger names the Indirect regex doesn't catch (e.g. "TCS", "Professional Tax").

Per-ledger Operating variance 18 ledgers · every rupee traced

Sum of the Δ column equals the Operating variance between methods. Rows with Δ > 0 = Indirect over-counts; Δ < 0 = Indirect under-counts. Sort: biggest absolute variance first.

Ledger Nature Category Indirect Op Direct Op Δ (Ind − Dir) Indirect classification rule applied
Professional Fees income Revenue 170,000.00 0.00 170,000.00 income (+Cr−Dr = 170,000.00−0.00)
Sundry Debtors asset Trade Receivables -123,900.00 0.00 -123,900.00 asset Receivable — −(Dr−Cr) = −(205,600.00−81,700.00)
Finaccle Advisory Private Limited 0.00 43,200.00 -43,200.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Partner Reimbursement (Rahul) liability Partner Reimbursement -30,100.00 0.00 -30,100.00 liability Payable — +(Cr−Dr) = +(44,900.00−75,000.00)
IGST 0.00 -30,000.00 30,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
GA Design 0.00 27,000.00 -27,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Duties & Taxes liability Duties & Taxes -10,200.00 0.00 -10,200.00 liability nan — +(Cr−Dr) = +(30,600.00−40,800.00)
Indian Instute of Corporate Affairs 0.00 -9,855.23 9,855.23 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Staff Welfare Expenses expense Employee Cost -14,500.00 -24,220.49 9,720.49 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(14,500.00−0.00))
Office Expenses expense Office & Admin -8,500.00 -14,198.22 5,698.22 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(8,500.00−0.00))
Travelling Expense expense Travel & Field -7,500.00 -12,527.84 5,027.84 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(7,500.00−0.00))
Subscription (Professional) expense Office & Admin -5,000.00 0.00 -5,000.00 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(5,000.00−0.00))
S S M G & ASSOCIATES LLP 0.00 5,000.00 -5,000.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
CGST 0.00 -4,950.00 4,950.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
SGST 0.00 -4,950.00 4,950.00 (ledger seen only in Direct)
Business Meeting Expenses expense Travel & Field -6,000.00 -10,022.27 4,022.27 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(6,000.00−0.00))
Telephone Expenses expense Office & Admin -2,500.00 -4,175.95 1,675.95 expense (−(Dr−Cr) = −(2,500.00−0.00))
TDS Receivable 24-25 asset TDS Receivable -1,500.00 0.00 -1,500.00 asset nan — −(Dr−Cr) = −(6,500.00−5,000.00)
Totals -39,700.00 -39,700.00 0.00
Engine's Indirect Op (from `indirect_operating_net`) -39,700.00 -39,700.00 0.00 Must match the Totals row above (within paisa of rounding). Any mismatch ⇒ attribution rule bug.

How to read this: each ledger contributes a specific amount to Indirect Operating (per accrual rules: income ⇒ +Cr−Dr, expense ⇒ −(Dr−Cr), asset WC ⇒ −(Dr−Cr), liability WC ⇒ +(Cr−Dr)). Direct attributes cash flow per actual voucher processing. Where the two diverge by a non-trivial amount, it's a specific mapping / classification / treatment issue on that ledger — not "rounding". Click a row's ledger name in a future version to see every voucher that touched it.

Equity ledgers pulled into Indirect engine 4 ledger(s) · debug Financing variance

Everything here contributes to raw_eq_delta; PAT is subtracted at end. If your P&L A/c or Reserves ledger is missing from this list, that's why Financing variance = PAT — my mask didn't catch it.

Ledger Nature tag Category Δ (Cr − Dr) Included because
Prateek Agrawal equity Partner's Capital 0.00 nature=equity
Rahul Nathani equity Partner's Capital -75,000.00 nature=equity
Sakshi Nathani Partner A/c equity Partner's Capital 0.00 nature=equity
Profit & Loss A/c equity Retained Earnings 0.00 nature=equity + name matches P&L/Reserves pattern + category='Retained Earnings' matches
raw_eq_delta (sum of above) -75,000.00
PAT adjustment decision: PAT not posted to any equity ledger (P&L Δ = 0.00, partner net Δ = -75,000.00 is pure drawings). PAT still sits unposted in Income−Expense, so ΔEquity already equals −Drawings and no PAT subtraction is needed.

If Direct's partner-drawings figure ≠ Indirect's equity Δ (after PAT adjustment), that's a mapping/tagging problem. The Direct figure comes from actual Dr <Partner> / Cr Bank voucher lines — this is ground truth. If Indirect says something different, investigate the partner-ledger TB classification or PAT value.